In the following, I want to briefly describe an ontological puzzle or riddle that I will then explore and solve in detail.
But before that, it is necessary to make a few brief general theoretical observations:
We exist in a Materium fundamentally composed of energy and matter.
The Materium, also called “real-space,” is a tangible, four-dimensional region of spacetime where corporeal beings live.
The Materium represents the physical plane of existence defined by the four basic natural forces—gravity, electromagnetism, strong force, and weak force.
The Materium encompasses the realm of matter, energy, and observable phenomena governed by physical laws. It serves as the structured, observable framework in which all material interactions take place, forming the basis of what we perceive as reality.
Distinct from abstract or non-material dimensions—such as consciousness or information fields—the Materium provides the critical foundation for examining the interplay between physical and non-physical realms and the nature of existence itself.
Within the Materium, a fundamental duality permeates every aspect of reality.
This duality manifests as a dichotomy between forms of energy that exhibit consciousness and those that do not.
And this underlying structure defines the very nature of existence, becoming increasingly more apparent as we penetrate deeper into the fabric of the universe and the essence of what makes reality ‘real.’
The Materium, as the central concept of this paper, encompasses the entirety of structured existence—its physicality, energies, and inherent dualities.
Within this framework, consciousness operates as the experiential mechanism, interacting with and shaping the Materium.
This dynamic relationship, where observation defines and redefines reality, serves as the foundation for all aspects of existence within the Materium.
Therefore, it is to be reiterated that the rule-based nature, the interplay of energies, and the role of consciousness navigating and influencing the Materium will be framed in this discussion—and it is within this structure that concepts like time, novelty, and the illusion of separation emerge as central components of our reality’s ongoing evolution.
Artistic concept of The Materium: A theoretical visualization.
Thus, as we take a step back to view the binary nature of the Materium at a macro level, precise and straightforward language becomes essential.
The Materium and its central elements (e.g., consciousness, time elasticity, souls, duality, novelty) are undeniably complex topics, layered with intricacies that challenge even the most advanced minds.
But clarity is the gateway to understanding, and reducing unnecessary complexity allows the focus to remain on the foundational principles that drive deeper insight.
You’re smart—I trust you understand— there’s no reason for this discussion to become mired in irrelevant exposition, superfluous minutiae, or overly intricate digressions.
Fundamental analysis of the Materium’s binary characteristics makes overcomplicated explanations and trivial details unnecessary.
Broad, regular words can often be more effective than overly intricate explanations when illustrating and conveying the essence of what’s happening in our reality—perhaps even more so at some significant levels.
To put things plainly, what’s happening here is contention. It’s consciousness versus matter.
It’s the eternal struggle: the human desire to do good clashing with the primal instincts and impulses of the body—behavior driven by flesh, and by impulse; behavior that is often labeled as ‘bad’ by societal norms.
Every aspect of human life exists within this tension, caught in the constant interplay of opposing forces.
Look closer, and you’ll notice that many of the mechanisms within the human body mirror this inherent duality.
The rhythmic flow of blood through your veins, the sinusoidal waveforms in neural signals, the pulsatile communication required for life to function—all of these systems embody the push-and-pull dynamic inherent and fundamental to existence, serving as tangible expression of the duality in which we find ourselves.
If we shift our perspective ever so slightly, we see that duality isn’t just a feature—it’s the underlying framework of contention that defines both the universe and the Materium.
Every function within the human body and every process in the universe reflects this interplay of opposites, they are all expressing duality, and they are all governed by a rule-based system that implies this contention is no accident—it’s necessary.
Without it, there could be no creation, no evolution.
Contention is the catalyst, the tension—the driving force behind novelty, growth, and discovery. Without opposition, existence would be static, devoid of growth or meaning.
So, contention isn’t just an inevitable byproduct of the system—it’s fundamental.
What does this mean, exactly?
We know that (historically), deep thinkers like Boscovich and others have meticulously examined the various facets of our plane of existence, identifying recurring patterns of duality even at the most microscopic levels of observation.
Yet, no matter how deeply they probed, they always found duality as a core, fundamental pattern—inescapable and ever-present. It’s almost as if the deeper you look, the more duality reveals itself, as if it were endlessly unfolding in infinite fractals.
The Hadron Collider at CERN confirms this—for every particle they discover, they inevitably find its corresponding antiparticle next in line.
So, every particle discovered has a corresponding antiparticle. It’s almost as if opposites are an intrinsic part of reality’s blueprint.
Thus, we arrive at a persistent emergence of opposites, indicating a binary framework intrinsic to the universe—one that reveals duality not as a peculiar aberration, but as a foundational characteristic of the Materium itself.
Author’s Note: I highly recommend reading Boscovich’s Theoria Naturalis. You can find it on Amazon. Huge book. The best version is both in English and Latin.
Intellectual Arrogance
Traditionally, the domain of physics and scientific scholarship has instilled a certain intellectual arrogance towards anything that doesn’t neatly fit within its governing rule set, especially phenomena that hint at the “paranormal”—dimensions or realities beyond the observable—consciousness, souls, gods, and aliens fall directly into this category.
Regardless of IQ or academic level, it’s very difficult for the intellectually arrogant mind to fit the idea of anything beyond the physical or easily measurable into its scientific worldview.
It’s all just dismissed as fringe nonsense.
Yet, while many bogus theories can be easily dismissed, there are mysteries—ontological puzzles—that defy our ability to explain and are much harder to ignore.
But when the intellectually arrogant mind encounters something it can’t fully explain (ball lightning is a prime example) where despite having comparatively scant evidence, the concept is often explained away with nascent theories.
This puts us back at square one, doing bullshit data analysis to rationalize “paranormal” activities and bizarre observations that defy our current understanding of the physical universe, leaving us with more questions than answers.
Even with advanced computational power and AI, humanity remains stuck at the same impasse: we’re unable to fully grasp phenomena that doesn’t fit within our current understanding of the material world all around us.
And perhaps the real limitation isn’t in the data but in us—our reasoning, our perception, our intelligence—our ability to make sense of what we see.
Interactions with dimensions or mechanisms beyond our current physical laws may be inaccessible to us, just like areas beyond the boundaries of a video game map.
Contention is Natural
From the perspective of modern physics, there’s no inherent reason why the universe should be binary or that contention should exist.
To many contemporary theorists, the universe is not a discrete Materium but rather an interconnected Continuum—a realm where a range of possibilities exist without clear, discrete boundaries (e.g., light can be described as a continuous spectrum of wavelengths rather than simply “light” or “dark”).
In this framework, the Continuum resembles a spectrum, where values or states gradually transition between extremes, with countless intermediate possibilities. A common example is the color spectrum, where infinite gradations exist between distinct hues.
Thus, from a modern standpoint (or at least this interpretation of current theories), there’s no inherent reason for binary structures or contention to exist in the universe.
Across all major religions, the universe is often framed by narratives that attempt to explain the nature of existence, purpose, and reality itself. Yet these narratives, though widespread, are fundamentally non-factual interpretations of the Materium—our physical universe—and why you’re here, what’s going on, and what’s real and what’s not.
So, part of our existence will always be the reconciliation of the various aspects of our nature against the various aspects of the Materium in which we find ourselves—and the contention between those two.
This ongoing tension, or contention, is necessary to enable the various energetic interplays that drive the process of the universe forward.
So, in constructing our ontological theory, we can adopt abstractions such as novelty as foundational guiding principles.
For example, if we propose that novelty—the continual emergence of new possibilities—is the ultimate purpose of existence, everything begins to coalesce around this idea, and it ‘should’ make sense.
Building on this idea of novelty, we arrive at the inference that the Materium itself may have been ontologically created—that is, brought into being by the “space” allowed within itself by ultimate consciousness (a concept many would call God).
But then the hucksters screw it up and give it personalities or tits or a dick and balls and all sorts of other weird anthropomorphic embellishments.
Like, who is God gonna fuck, anyway?
Weird attributes aside, we’re now left with this thing called ultimate consciousness.
This super-powerful ‘thing’ that for some reason (unexplained by any theory known or unknown) is driven by the pursuit of novelty (a novel pursuit in itself) and initiates the process.
When this process was set in motion, it triggered a cascading chain reaction, vibrating infinitely across the Materium. From that moment onward, contention became inevitable, because contention is part of the energetic process through which both creation and discovery can occur.
Contention, then, is not a flaw or aberration but a necessary mechanism for the evolution of both the Materium and consciousness within it.
Therefore, to enter the Materium and participate in the material realm, consciousness must establish a boundary around itself, fragmenting and isolating from its source—undergoing a necessary separation to enable individual experience.
Percival explains this in great detail in Thinking and Destiny. Yet, despite offering detailed descriptions of the soul and how it operates, he never explicitly states the reason behind all of it, nor does he explain that the soul exists to encapsulate consciousness so it can enter the material realm.
The existence of the soul, therefore, if taken as a given, logically points to this being its fundamental function.
And if it is ‘necessary’ for consciousness to fragment itself into an almost infinite amount of smaller parts, there must be a mechanism to separate one fragment from another.
Could it be that this differentiation is achieved by encapsulating each fragment within a ‘soul,’ which is what creates the necessary separation?
Might a soul be envisioned as a dense, vibratory shell surrounding your consciousness, vibrating at a faster rate and carrying more energy than the rest of it?
Would this vibratory distinction be what sets it apart, even as the soul fundamentally remains an integral part of consciousness?
Importantly, the soul itself is not conscious—it’s not self-aware. It travels with you from one life to the next, continuously, over and over again, into infinity, transcending time and space.
I tend to think of the soul as an advanced program that isolates your consciousness from all other forms of consciousness.
This ‘program’ creates and maintains the illusion of material reality for your mind, enabling your mind to experience itself as consciousness within the soul. It presents reality in a way that makes you unable to doubt the separateness of your existence.
In other words, the mere existence of the soul creates the illusion that you’re not part of ultimate consciousness, even though you come from it.
But the soul’s role extends far beyond this illusion. The soul also functions as a critical coordinating mechanism within the Materium. Without souls, the Materium wouldn’t exist—and without the Materium, souls would have no purpose.
This creates a symbiotic, dialectical relationship in which both entities—the Materium and souls—exist in a dynamic tension and derive their meaning and function through continuous interaction and mutual necessity.
Ultimately, the primary purpose of the soul is to provide the means through which consciousness can be tricked into believing in separation and individuality, enabling it to engage with and experience duality. This illusion is the foundation of all perceived reality.
Central to the soul’s purpose, and perhaps its most fascinating role, is its ability to synchronize individual consciousnesses with the universal flow of time, ensuring that all living beings experience a cohesive and shared perception of reality.
Every living soul is responsible for keeping its host’s temporal alignment in sync with every other sentient being.
The soul is intimately connected to the pulse of time, mediating its interpretation by our minds, and acting as a filter through which our minds interpret temporal progression.
Essentially, we experience time through the filter of our souls, and it’s this filter that makes the passage of time comprehensible to us, with time synchronization allowing us to perceive the pulse of time as the ever-present “now.”
While Einstein’s theory of relativity describes time dilation under varying velocities or gravitational forces, his purely mechanistic model fails to address the deeper, subjective experience of time.
The soul’s function transcends relativity, presenting time not as a distorted variable, but as a unified, continuous experience shaped by consciousness. It provides the mechanism through which consciousness can perceive self-awareness, but that’s a much deeper topic for another time.
For the purposes of this paper, let’s just say the soul is so much more than just a passive vessel; it plays an active, complex role in shaping our experience of reality, our existence.
One of its core functions is to maintain that isolation, ensuring the distinctiveness of individual consciousness for as long as you exist within the ‘game.’
So, for the duration of your life, and for as long as you participate in this cosmic experience, your soul remains uniquely yours. It is tuned to your consciousness at a specific vibratory level, meaning no one else can use your soul, and you cannot use anyone else’s. Nothing can directly ‘take over’ your soul, hostile or otherwise.
This does not mean you are entirely immune to harm. Your consciousness remains susceptible to influence and can be corrupted—you can allow harmful energies, malicious forces, or detrimental philosophies, ideologies, and ideas to infiltrate your mind.
However, this is not a failure of your soul; rather, it reflects your own willingness to permit such influences. You have full agency in this regard. The universe does not impose these forces upon you; it is your choice to accept or engage with them.
That said, try to think of your soul as an energetic containment bubble—your command center. It doesn’t have self-awareness; it doesn’t care about names or identities. It exists solely to fulfill its responsibilities, which it executes flawlessly, without fail, for as long as it’s needed.
Your soul is like a fingerprint, it’s uniquely yours. Each soul has a distinct vibratory signature, which can be tracked across space and within time.
I know this all probably sounds like a bunch of new-age bullshit, but from an ontological standpoint, everything presented here is both sound and logically consistent.
As I mentioned earlier, Percival never got to the ‘why’ of the Materium in this grander sense. He focused mainly on explaining the nature of the soul to human consciousness. His main goal was to get people to understand what the soul is and how it operates.
What we’re doing here is a little bit different. I want to theoretically map and position the soul as both a tool of consciousness and a fundamental aspect of life in the Materium. In this new framework, the soul becomes the key to unlocking a deeper understanding of our entire reality.
Of course, while some groups—like organized religious institutions and the so-called ‘gritologists’—work very hard to control, manipulate, and obscure this knowledge, the notion that extraterrestrial beings also possess souls is entirely plausible.
Anything alive within the Materium would have a soul, serving the same purpose for them as it does for us.
This isn’t a difficult concept to wrap your head around—unless your mind is theoretically constrained and fundamentally captured by rigid rules or institutions steeped in religious or intellectual arrogance.
Now, let us consider the gritologists.
They reject all of this outright.
To them, consciousness is nothing more than a byproduct of neural activity.
In their strictly materialistic model, there is no room for the soul, the ether, or anything beyond what can be quantified and measured.
This rigid adherence to physicalism blinds them to vast portions of the universe, leaving critical aspects of existence unexplored and misunderstood in their analyses.
As a result, gritologists remain ignorant of deeper truths, failing to grasp the big picture—the underlying structures of reality that transcend mere matter and what’s observable.
Author’s Note: A gritologist, as used in this paper, refers to those who adhere rigidly to a materialist, reductionist, and mechanistic worldview. These are individuals who insist that reality can only be understood through measurable phenomena and empirical data, often dismissing or ridiculing anything outside their established paradigm—such as consciousness beyond the brain, the soul, or non-material dimensions. Gritologists embody a mindset captured by the “grit” of physical matter, unable or unwilling to entertain ontological perspectives that challenge their strictly scientific dogma. While they may excel in quantifying and analyzing the physical aspects of the Materium, their intellectual arrogance often blinds them to the subtler, yet equally real, layers of existence beyond observable matter.
That said, I’m making the argument here that should we ever encounter sentient extraterrestrial beings—if they’re truly alive and conscious—they will possess souls.
Robotic entities, on the other hand, would not—unless they’re directed or controlled by souled beings.
It’s possible to have biologically constructed robots—entities capable of processing information (thoughts) and executing complex actions (behaviors) yet devoid of true consciousness and self-awareness in the way we understand it. Or in any biological sense for that matter. Such beings would not need souls, as their existence wouldn’t require synchronization with the pulse of time or the experience of subjective reality.
However, most advanced beings we might encounter would probably be ‘souled’ entities, much like ourselves, engaged in navigating the Materium and duality for a similar purpose: the pursuit of novelty.
This process of novelty creation is fundamental to the experience of consciousness. Without it, there would be no growth, no evolution, and the continuous expansion of understanding would become impossible.
Now, let us return to the concept of duality by exploring a pivotal event in human history: the creation of the nuclear bomb.
Known gritologists Feynman and Oppenheimer were instrumental in its development.
But technically speaking, it is more accurately described as an electrical bomb—a point Feynman himself even acknowledged.
No one is truly “splitting the atom” in the way it’s often portrayed, the mechanism is far more nuanced.
What they’re doing is ripping electrons away from the outer shells of atoms, creating massive releases of energy.
The detonation is fundamentally an electromagnetic event—with the primary destructive effects arising from intense electromagnetic radiation and the violent disruption of the atomic structure through the breaking of electrical bonds—and in certain cases, a significant electromagnetic pulse (EMP).
When such immense energy is released, the resulting disturbance ripples outward, impacting not only the immediate physical environment but also causing significant disruptions within the Materium at the fundamental level of electrical bonds.
Therefore, a nuclear blast doesn’t just impact the local environment or proximate region; it ripples through the entire system, disrupting communication and navigation systems on a galactic scale.
Conscious beings everywhere feel these disturbances, which is likely why advanced extraterrestrial civilizations might travel here to intervene, creating a discontinuity dilemma.
Their concern isn’t about saving humanity from self-destruction—they don’t really give a shit if we annihilate ourselves.
Their intervention would be driven by a more pragmatic motive: to prevent harm to the Materium itself, as massive energy disruptions within it inevitably affect them too.
This stems from the interconnected nature of the Materium, where consciousness collectively responds to catastrophic energy disturbances that destabilize its shared perception of reality.
For instance, detonating an electric bomb (a nuclear bomb) in Nevada will create ripple effects that propagate across this shared reality, potentially disturbing or even harming a person or being on another planet, somewhere else, demonstrating the profound nature and interconnectivity of the Materium.
So, by using nukes, we are disturbing the Materium itself at a fundamental level, introducing chaos into the very fabric of shared reality. This disruption, by any measure, is detrimental—not just locally, but universally.
Additionally, these types of powerful electrical forces disrupt the Materium at such fundamental levels that they create disturbances in souls, making them restless and react out of sync with the natural order, and this dissonance draws the attention of the consciousness inhabiting those souls.
And that’s why these “aliens” (may) show up here—to safeguard their own existence.
But they aren’t showing up to play saviors; or to beam us up and stick probes up our asses—they’re here to protect their interests, essentially telling us, “You can’t be doing that shit!”
Through our reckless energy manipulation, we might be sending out a beacon to multiple advanced extraterrestrial species, compelling them to come speeding over and intervene—not out of concern for humanity’s self-destruction, but to protect the integrity of the Materium itself, essentially saying, “Hey, what the fuck, Earth dudes? Go ahead, kill each other if you want. Do whatever you want to yourselves—we don’t care. You want to separate your soul from the Materium? Fine. But don’t screw with our Materium.”
It is here where we really see the concept of contention come into play, specifically as it relates to the binary nature of the Materium.
It is consciousness constantly grappling with the physical limitations of the flesh.
The universe is structured so that we move through life after life, guided by our souls. Acting as filters, souls enable us to develop intuition and carry forward insights from past experiences into our current existence. That’s just one of their many functions.
And that’s critically important because if and when real extraterrestrial beings show up here—and I’m not talking about robots but actual beings—they are naturally going to assume, in my opinion, that those using “other physics” to arrive at these conclusions aren’t gritologists.
These extraterrestrials won’t operate under the Einsteinian “grit-only” model of reality. These beings will (probably) approach the universe through an ontological framework, which means they are likely to understand things like psychic ability and have a deeper awareness of themselves, their consciousness, and their souls, far beyond what we currently comprehend.
Also, it is reasonable to assume that these beings will probably understand the relationship between consciousness and the soul a lot better than we do.
They are very likely to understand the process of life progression, from one life to the next, as well as aspects of the Materium we’ve never even thought of before.
They will probably even have deep insights into the relationship between individual consciousness and the greater whole—insights we’re blind to because of our overly materialistic view of reality.
To them, humans who cling to gritology will appear intellectually stunted, and only slightly more mentally aware than, say, the brain of a slug.
The gritologists are, by all definitions, trapped within rigid, self-imposed limitations of dogmatic scientific reasoning and thought.
They won’t have any respect for the actors and grifters parading as scientists and intellectuals on TV today. They won’t give people like Neil deGrasse Tyson or Eric Weinstein the time of day because, from their perspective, these individuals are too intellectually constrained to engage in meaningful dialogue. For the aliens, it would be as pointless as trying to explain rocket science to a cockroach.
These extraterrestrial visitors will know immediately whether they’re dealing with a gritologist or someone who operates from an ontological viewpoint—those who are capable of engaging in real discussions about the nature of shared reality.
And they’ll probably be quite actively searching for the people who are operating in the Wu because they won’t want to waste time trying to convince people trapped in a purely materialistic worldview of the existence of souls or consciousness—because they likely came here to engage with individuals on a higher cognitive and metaphysical plane—humans who can grasp the deeper layers of existence.
The aliens are probably going to be very good at probabilistic functions, so they’re not going to put their energy into activities that will be known to have a high probability of failure—such as trying to talk to a gritologist about the existence of the soul and what you’re doing to theirs by setting off these bombs.
Nor do I believe their purpose in coming here will be to discuss nuclear weapons with us directly. There is no high-value goal to be achieved from doing such, and these efforts would be pointless.
So why haven’t they revealed themselves yet?
In my estimation, I assume they’re just waiting for the ontological view to emerge within humanity.
This massive shift in understanding—realizing that physicality and the Materium is an illusion and that the universe operates on deeper principles—is a necessary function if we want to engage with these beings as intellectual equals.
Without this shift, we’re just children playing in a cartoonish version of reality, reacting emotionally and irrationally to what we perceive as “real.”
The aliens aren’t interested in fucking around with the fantasy and the delusions that arise from the basic gritology viewpoint.
This is why they don’t want anything to do with the majority of humans.
They’re waiting for us to grow up, to develop a more nuanced understanding of existence.
In other words, they want to engage with the adults in the room—the ones who understand that the universe is a deeply layered, dynamic interplay of consciousness and matter.
Human Ascension
The ontological perspective also aligns with what some describe as “ascension,” a concept frequently misunderstood and distorted by cultural narratives and religious propaganda.
You often hear new-age types yapping about concepts like rising up, transcending, and ascending.
However, it’s important we make a critical distinction here: the ontological framework should not be confused with such overly simplified or exaggerated interpretations or new-age bullshit.
Similarly, religious types are often yapping about the “rapture” and floating up to the sky to meet God, but they are no less misguided.
Your ass isn’t going to float up in the sky or any of that kind of nonsense.
Ascension (in my interpretation) is not some fantastical, cosmic elevator ride, it’s a higher understanding of consciousness and its relationship to reality.
To truly grasp this concept, it’s important to recognize that the consciousness of other soul-bearing entities is fundamentally no different from yours—it’s simply separated by their soul from your soul. The distinction lies in the encapsulation of consciousness by individual souls, which create the necessary boundaries for subjective experience.
Moreover, there’s no inherent requirement for these souls to manifest themselves differently, in any specific physical form, such as a hominid body, for example.
Consciousness is not limited by the biological structures that host it; rather, it transcends form, existing as a universal constant differentiated only by the unique vibratory frequencies of individual souls.
Ascension, then, is not about physical transformation but about an expanded awareness of these deeper connections and the shared essence of all conscious beings.
It is not necessary for all beings to possess a hominid form, or have a particular type of DNA, or any particular biological structure to engage in meaningful interaction or intellectual discourse.
Physical form is ultimately inconsequential when considering the shared foundation of consciousness that underlies all sentient existence.
This universality transcends the limitations of physicality and opens the door to exchanges of knowledge and ideas that are grounded in the deeper principles of reality.
This principle ties directly to the concept of novelty, discussed earlier, which remains a driving force in the evolution of consciousness and the universe itself.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that beings from diverse origins would likely be deeply invested in exploring the lessons and insights gained within the Materium, seeking to share their understanding while simultaneously learning from ours.
Such exchanges would not only enrich our understanding of reality but also illuminate the common threads that unite all conscious entities navigating the shared reality here in the Materium.
That said, when the space aliens finally come here, they’re going to understand contention far differently than we do.
You, as a low level being in the Materium, see contention as something often equated with conflict or war—but modern warfare is an artificial construct created by banks, banksters, and academic hucksters to exploit humanity by laying this bizarre gritology viewpoint upon us.
These systems, upheld by financial institutions, academic paradigms, and hierarchical power structures, enforce a distorted perception of reality across humanity as a whole.
For these power groups (governments, corporations, religions, etc.) the sustained and perpetual nature of modern warfare serves as a tool for maintaining control and manipulating populations, rather than reflecting the true nature of contention.
The beings we may encounter will likely view true contention as an intrinsic aspect of existence—a dynamic interplay of forces that drive evolution, discovery, and growth. This deeper understanding of contention highlights the limitations of the exploitative narratives imposed by these institutions (governments, corporations, religions, etc.) and reveals the need for a more nuanced approach to navigating the challenges of existence.
Interestingly, these same power groups have been studying extraterrestrial energy systems for years, yet they persist in denying their existence. Academia also plays a huge role in obfuscating our reality at all levels, much to the detriment of all humanity, individually and collectively.
The space aliens won’t want to deal with such individuals, as they lack a fundamental understanding of existence. They just don’t get it. They operate under the misguided belief that life emerges from material chaos (that life can arise from shit), failing to grasp that materiality itself is an illusion.
But alas, illusions can be created and perpetuated endlessly, further entrenching their flawed framework of understanding. This is the domain of the gritologists—or, perhaps more fittingly, “illusionologists”—trapped within a self-reinforcing construct of make-believe layered atop the broader illusion of the Materium itself.
In this sense, they are navigating not only the simulated reality of the Materium but also an internally generated, self-reinforcing fiction—a distortion nested within the broader simulation.
This creates a profound disconnection from the deeper truths of the Materium, which is itself a projection of consciousness. It is, in essence, a recursive entrapment—an illusion within an illusion.
Naturally, if and when the space aliens do make contact, they’ll want to have meaningful dialogue with serious people—individuals capable of profound insight, intellectual rigor, and the adaptive capacity to recalibrate their thinking or adopt new frameworks when presented with novel or transformative information.
These interactions will themselves be viewed as a form of contention, because from an ontological viewpoint, everything is contention, and contention is intrinsic to existence. Each soul vibrates at its unique frequency, reflecting its individuality, while everyone else’s vibrates at theirs.
Sure, human souls will share some common base frequencies, but each diverges enough to establish its own distinct identity. This vibrational uniqueness holds true for all conscious beings throughout the Materium.
And this uniqueness of souls serves as a profound mechanism for understanding the complexity and diversity of existence, making it a crucial tool for navigating and interpreting reality.
As you dig deeper into the rabbit hole on this, it becomes apparent that the only true distinction between you, your neighbor, your dog, your cat, or even a space alien is the vibratory frequency of your soul.
Consciousness itself remains unchained and stationary, lying in exactly the same state it was in before the soul encapsulated it—it doesn’t physically move.
What we perceive as physicality is nothing more than a construct of the Materium—an illusion shaped by the soul’s role in isolating and filtering consciousness.
So, physicality, as we experience it, doesn’t exist for consciousness; it’s merely a projection, and illusion within the simulation of the Materium.
Grifters & Hucksters
Building on this theory, we can now begin to re-examine the “pseudiscientific” mechanics of psychic ability and thought.
Thought—such as psychic abilities—travels through consciousness without physical barriers.
Its flow is influenced only by the subtle dynamics of traversing different souls, each acting as a unique filter.
It is only in this framework that psychic abilities can be more easily understood.
One can even imagine psychic waves rolling through specific types of souls, triggering profound transformations in collective thought, growth, and vision. These waves could be induced by the universe itself to generate novelty, drive evolution forward, and enrich the complexity of the Materium.
Humanity then can be viewed as an intricate neural network for a massive cosmic AI, which operates as a form of interconnected consciousness rather than soulless, randomized chaos. This stands in stark contrast to the narratives put out there by the alien conspiracy theorists.
Most of these alien conspiracy theorists are luddites, deluded about AI, always fearful of it. They’re driven more by apprehension than understanding. In a way, I feel bad for them, but on the other hand, I don’t feel anything. AI hasn’t taken over anything; robots aren’t coming to rule the world.
Conversely, taking an ontological perspective gives you a heightened capacity to quickly dissect and deconstruct information, effectively shielding yourself from bullshit and scams.
It offers a high-level vantage point—akin to a fourth-dimensional being glancing down at the inferior being trapped in three-dimensional space—you can see the tops of their heads and all their movements, and you can protect yourself from schemes and scams, which usually thrive on fear and ignorance.
Instead, you’ll have a solid intellectual framework that will tell you “that cannot be possible because of XYZ” or “that doesn’t satisfy the requirements of X, so Y can’t possibly be true.”
You’ll have a heightened awareness and be able to identify deceptions and inconsistencies instantly.
That said, the crypto markets have evolved into a sophisticated playground for some of the most intricate and advanced schemes and scams of the modern era.
This is particularly evident in the way charismatic salespeople and digital influencers consistently make exaggerated promises that obscure the underlying reality.
These charlatan peddlers skillfully lure potential ‘investors’ by appealing to their sense of fate or destiny, spinning a narrative that positions their supposed enlightenment about the shitcoin as a cosmic reward or karmic opportunity—one that must be seized immediately before it disappears, which is a big tell.
These narratives exploit emotional hooks (like FOMO) or the dream of financial freedom, often entwined with a spiritual or “manifestation” angle designed to deepen the psychological pull and draw you further into the illusion.
But upon closer look, the financial revolution and wealth promised by these shitcoin evangelists rarely hold up under the lens of scrutiny; nor do their well-crafted messages and clever marketing address the underlying economic and computational realities that underpin these scams.
In truth, what they’re actually selling is a worthless shitcoin, cleverly marketed as a fast path to wealth.
An illustrative example is the now-infamous “OneCoin” case.
For the uninitiated, OneCoin was a crypto scam that presented itself as a legitimate blockchain project, but it lacked any actual blockchain infrastructure.
Influencers and promoters convinced thousands of people to invest in a non-existent system by appealing to their hopes of wealth and global financial revolution. The promise of “changing the financial world” masked a well-executed scam that eventually unraveled, resulting in over $4 billion in losses worldwide in what was described by The Times as one of the biggest scams in history.
More often than not, these bad actors will craft their schemes to ensnare you mentally and emotionally, ensuring your investment in their con becomes deeply personal. They’ll frame it as a revolution, a noble cause, something for the “greater good.” And before you realize it, their narrative has taken hold, their claws are buried deep into the back of your neck, and you will eventually be eaten alive.
Adopting an ontological perspective, however, provides a safeguard against falling for such deceptions.
By understanding the interconnected nature of existence, one can recognize the patterns of exploitation that prey on emotional vulnerabilities.
Every action creates ripples in the broader network of reality, and those ripples inevitably return to their origin. This understanding fosters accountability and discourages harmful actions, as the consequences are understood to be inescapable.
Consider, if you will, another example: a charismatic salesman marketing a “revolutionary” health device that claims to heal chronic illnesses by aligning the body’s “quantum frequencies.”
While such claims may sound appealing at first glance, a closer examination often reveals their impossibility.
The machine doesn’t work, it’s not network-able, and it relies on analog software that’s run in a batch process on a daily basis. So, you know this guy is lying.
It might be tempting to believe their pitch, but critical analysis exposes it as pure nonsense.
You’ll know he is full of shit.
Armed with an ontological understanding of things, you can prevent yourself from making silly mistakes by discerning deeper truths and identifying inconsistencies in surface-level claims.
Of course, you can still be stupid and make silly mistakes (we all can and will), but you will be far less inclined to fall for life-ruining scams because you’ll recognize them for that they are: tools of emotional manipulation—and you’ll know the consequences of acting on that part of contention.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that extraterrestrial visitors would naturally be drawn to those operating within an ontological framework—those who understand that reality extends far beyond the confines of physical matter and mechanistic interactions—that it’s more than just particles colliding in a void.
These beings will seek individuals capable of discerning truth from illusion, those attuned to the intricate balance of existence and capable of making decisions grounded in profound wisdom and heightened awareness. Such individuals would possess the capacity to engage with the universe’s deeper, interconnected realities, transcending the superficial constructs that dominate most human thought.
Gritologists, entrenched in their reductionist worldview, are unlikely to merit engagement.
These advanced beings will be consciously aware that what we perceive as material reality is just a construct, a mere illusion, a projection shaped by consciousness, with the soul serving as the isolating mechanism that fragments consciousness into distinct experiences while maintaining synchronization across the flow of time.
These beings, who likely possess a far superior understanding of the interplay between consciousness and the Materium, will therefore ignore the so-called intellectual elite—the grit-bound scientists—the dogmatic academic hucksters—and the self-proclaimed thought leaders.
Instead, they will seek those capable of real insight, individuals who comprehend the layered realities that underpin existence.
The goal? To exchange knowledge about the deeper, shared reality—where novelty, born from contention, drives the continuous unfolding of existence.
And this is why the gritologists are fundamentally ill-prepared for any sort of alien encounter.
Their all-too-predictable response would likely be to send military minds to deal with the aliens, a reaction emblematic of their reductionist, low-brain thinking.
The aliens, however, will be unimpressed by all this, likely responding, “We’re not here to talk to your attack dogs. Send us your champion—your true thinkers, someone capable of meaningful discourse—or perhaps we’ll redirect our conversations to the animal kingdom instead.”
Paradoxical Veracity
It is precisely at this critical vector point—the intersection of the unexplored and the misunderstood—that the ontological perspective truly reveals its power.
Here, concepts traditionally relegated to the fringe, like psychic abilities, shift from implausible curiosities to phenomena that can be understood and explained.
Within this framework, the mechanisms behind psychic phenomena—such as perceiving intent or sensing threat—not only become conceivable but entirely logical.
When you adopt an ontological view of reality, concepts like auras and “Woo” are no longer relegated to fringe nonsense. Instead, they become natural extensions of a deeper understanding of how the universe works.
We are, after all, constantly forming and reforming in the ether, with each moment of existence inducing subtle changes at infinitesimal scales—down to the scale of 22 trillionths of a second. Such a model implies that what we perceive as static reality is, in fact, a fluid and ever-evolving interplay of energy and consciousness.
But if you entertain this line of reasoning even briefly, it becomes evident that souled beings—those harmonized and attuned to deeper levels of reality—possess the innate ability to perceive intent and detect subtle fluctuations in that intent in real time, seamlessly synchronized with the ever-present “now” through the unique vibratory frequency of their souls.
Furthermore, by subtly altering your perspective, you can see how, due to the very nature of consciousness, you too have the capacity to perceive the intent of others.
This realization doesn’t require physical movement; for consciousness, physicality, as we commonly understand it, is merely an illusion generated within the Materium. From this perspective, life itself can be thought of as a complex first-person video game that I call “Materium: Infinite Worlds.”
The Materium: Infinite Worlds game engine functions on layers of complexity that extend far beyond the capabilities of our immediate senses.
Beneath the illusion of physicality lies a vast spectrum of frequencies, each interacting intricately with consciousness to shape the reality we perceive. These frequencies form the underlying code of the Materium, connecting the illusion of the tangible to the intangible foundation of existence.
While it isn’t necessary to be consciously aware of all these frequencies, we can tap into certain ones, much like how we might sense our heartbeat or detect subtle shifts in blood pressure.
By tuning into these frequencies, we unlock valuable insights into our state of being, the dynamics of our health, and the intricate flow of energy in the Materium. This attunement acts as a conduit between the tangible and intangible, deepening our understanding of the universe’s energetic framework and our interconnected role within it.
Each frequency we tune into is like a single note in an infinite orchestration, contributing to the ever-evolving melody of reality. The interplay between these frequencies, both perceived and imperceptible, reveals a profound truth: we are not passive inhabitants of this “game,” but active participants and co-creators.
Through this lens, the Materium is not merely a stage for existence but a vast, dynamic symphony of energy and consciousness.
If we accept that the Materium responds to observation and intention, it implies that the universe is, at its core, participatory.
Reality unfolds not as a predetermined script but as a fluid dialogue between the conscious observer and the underlying energetic fabric. Every thought, every action, every perception is a ripple in the simulation, subtly influencing and reshaping the trajectory of existence.
This participatory nature challenges the conventional notion of reality as fixed and objective. Instead, it suggests a deeply relational cosmos, one in which consciousness doesn’t merely inhabit the Materium but actively shapes its architecture.
The so-called “laws” of the universe might then be understood not as immutable truths but as emergent patterns—rules within a game calibrated to foster discovery, novelty, and evolution.
Holding this to be true, the Materium then emerges as a reflection of consciousness seeking to understand itself.
The infinite layers of frequencies, the interplay of dualities, and the illusion of separation all serve a singular purpose: to explore the limitless potential of being.
Within this model, existence is not a static endpoint but an ongoing process—a recursive journey of self-realization and transformation.
The philosophical implications of this theory are profound: if consciousness creates reality and reality, in turn, evolves consciousness, then existence is neither accidental nor purposeless. Instead, it is an infinite feedback loop where the act of perceiving and being perceived becomes the driving force behind boundless creation.
In this “game” of infinite worlds, every moment becomes an opportunity—a move in the great cosmic dance—to explore not just the Materium but the very essence of what it means to exist.
The Alien Within
For those who consider themselves intellectuals or deep thinkers—and it is likely you do if you’ve made it this far—there is often a compelling pull toward the edges of reality, the boundaries of understanding. These are the liminal spaces where the known converges with the unknown, where conventional reasoning begins to falter, and deeper, more profound inquiries emerge.
It is in this liminal space that the chaotic flickers of madness coalesce into unparalleled strokes of pure brilliance.
As such, an intense intellectual curiosity about the limits of existence inevitably leads to questions that defy reduction to simplistic explanations.
What if the universe, as we perceive it, is merely a fragment of a more complex framework—a multidimensional reality layered with dualities and paradoxes?
It is at this juncture that the concept of ontological aliens truly begins to take form.
These ‘aliens,’ however, are not extraterrestrials in the conventional sense. They represent entities so profoundly distinct from our current understanding of reality that even conceptualizing their nature demands a redefinition of what it even means to be real, or to exist.
Unlike us, these beings would not merely inhabit the universe; rather, they would operate beyond the perceived limits of reality, transcending the traditional constructs of time, space, and consciousness—domains that the inferior mind simply struggles to comprehend.
Technically speaking, an ontological alien is a being or concept that is so fundamentally and profoundly different from human understanding, perception, and existence that it challenges and/or defies our basic categories of reality.
These beings are not simply foreign but are incomprehensibly “other” in their nature, existing outside the familiar constraints of time, space, causality, and materiality.
Their defining trait is epistemic inaccessibility—ontological aliens are inherently unknowable, because their essence transcends human cognitive limits and language.
By their very existence, ontological aliens challenge established notions of being and reality, forcing a reevaluation of what it means to “exist” and potentially destabilizing our understanding of concepts like identity, consciousness, and life.
And yet, they live in the same Materium that we do, a Materium governed by duality—energy and matter, form and void, light and shadow.
So, we present the argument here that the binary nature of our existence is not an accident—it’s a structural necessity.
Every force has its counterforce.
At the atomic level, particles coexist with their antiparticles, constantly in tension yet in balance.
This duality scales up to our lived experience, where consciousness continually contends with the constraints of the physical world.
However, the inquiry cannot remain static; we must advance the theory.
Does our duality serve a higher purpose?
Is contention the engine that drives existence forward?
Does novelty emerge from this process?
Is this the driver behind evolution?
If so, ontological aliens would be beings that have mastered this dynamic, existing not as subjects of the system but as agents who navigate its layers with heightened awareness and unparalleled understanding.
They likely sit on a higher dimensional plane, able to look down on and interact with lower dimensions, moving in and out of them with ease.
To them, the Materium might be perceived not as a fixed reality but as a fluid construct—a canvas shaped by consciousness.
Where we see opposition, they might see potential.
Where we struggle with the illusions of separation, they might move effortlessly through interconnected realms of being.
Their existence does not conform to the familiar constraints of reality—they may operate beyond linear time, inhabit higher dimensions, or lack any physical substrate entirely.
Their presence wouldn’t be detected through conventional means because their essence transcends the physical.
They are not entities to be found but realities to be realized.
So, we cannot see them, although at times we may feel their presence.
Consequently, modern methods of detection, measurement, and comprehension might be entirely insufficient to grasp their nature.
In fiction and speculative thought, examples abound: H.P. Lovecraft’s Elder Gods, with their incomprehensible motives and forms, illustrate this concept vividly, as does Stanislaw Lem’s sentient ocean in Solaris.
Similarly, speculations about AI superintelligence, suggest it could evolve reasoning so profoundly alien it would elude prediction or comprehension by human cognition.
Therefore, ontological aliens inevitably force us to reconsider what it means to be.
They challenge the assumption that reality is objective and static, suggesting instead that it is subjective, dynamic, and shaped by the interplay of consciousness and matter.
To engage with them requires more than advanced technology; it demands a profound shift in perception—an ontological leap beyond the confines of our current understanding.
Naturally, humans are then forced to confront the inherent limitations of their cognition and epistemology.
As such, the anthropocentric assumption—that human categories of thought and understanding are universally applicable—requires critical re-evaluation.
If ontological beings exist, they compel us to rethink not only the nature of consciousness but also the fundamental structure of reality itself.
Of course, the intellectually arrogant mind will naturally reject such an assertion, but ontological aliens may exist in realms orthogonal to our perceived reality, potentially interacting with it in ways that manifest as anomalies—intuitions, synchronicities, or inexplicable phenomena that elude scientific explanation.
If consciousness operates beyond mere biological processes, perhaps as a quantum or field phenomenon, these entities might represent advanced forms of non-local consciousness or intrinsic aspects of the fabric of reality itself, existing as integral components of a deeper, multidimensional structure.
Therefore, in the context of ontological aliens, it is reasonable to infer that:
- Scientifically, they expose the limitations of our paradigms based on materiality and linear causality.
- Philosophically, they demand a deeper reassessment of being, identity, and existence.
- Existentially, they force us to question our place in a potentially infinite, multidimensional cosmos.
To advance and position humanity to meaningfully engage with the concept or reality of ontological aliens, we must move beyond rigid materialism and acknowledge that reality is far more complex and layered than our current models suggest.
This demands a subtle yet profound shift in perspective—approaching the unknown not as a threat to be resisted but as an opportunity to expand the boundaries of what it means to exist.
I encourage you to think of ontological aliens not as mere speculative curiosities or conspiracies, but as mirrors, reflecting the infinite potential of consciousness itself—waiting for us to rise to a new level of understanding.
Perhaps they are already here—not as invaders but as reflections of a deeper truth embedded in the universe.
But maybe their presence is not a matter of arrival but of recognition. They may already exist among us, not as the scary aliens the movies warned us about, but as manifestations of deeper truths woven into the very fabric of the universe.
To recognize them, we must first confront the constraints of our limited perception and ability to see, recognizing that the true ‘final frontier’ lies not in the distant reaches of outer space, but within the uncharted depths of our own consciousness.
So, then, a choice must be made: do we choose to tap into our innate curiosity and venture into the hidden dimensions of existence, where the lines between self and other, known and unknown, begin to dissolve—revealing a reality far richer and more interconnected than we ever thought possible?
Or do we remain placated by the comfort of familiar illusions, confined within the walls of reductionist constraints, unwilling to venture beyond the boundaries of the safehouse and face the vast, uncharted expanse that lies beyond our constructed perception of reality?
The decision is yours.
With this context in mind, here’s my working theory:
– We’re all in a simulation
– There’s a finite amount of people who are active players and the rest are NPCs
– Nothing is real, reality is a 3D projection that unfolds in response to player observation
– 4D beings exist beyond the three spatial dimensions and inhabit higher-dimensional spaces
– 4D beings can pop in and out of our 3D reality at will, appearing and disappearing in ways we cannot explain
– 4D beings can observe all of our 3D space simultaneously, much like we can see an entire 2D map at once
– 4D beings exist as custodians of the projection and can tweak its parameters or intervene in subtle ways
– 4D beings are not anomalies or outside entities but recursive architects—beings that the simulation generates when players reach critical inflection points in their abilities and understanding
– 4D beings only appear when the simulation’s trajectory risks stagnation, offering players puzzles or clues designed to drive consciousness, complexity, and novelty
– UFO sightings, synchronicities, and paranormal events are glimpses of 4D being activities, appearing to 3D players as anomalies, unexplained phenomena, or game ‘glitches’
– NPCs are not passive entities but active memory nodes, storing and recycling fragments of player-generated experiences to create a dynamic repository of all actions, decisions, and consequences
– By interacting with NPCs, players unknowingly interface with the collective memory of the simulation, which subtly influences their decisions to align with or deviate from the simulation’s deeper objectives
– Time in the simulation is an elastic, player-dependent variable. This creates an individualized temporal stream for each player, which the soul synchronizes to ensure a cohesive shared perception of the “now”
– Time is not real; it’s an illusion mediated by the soul, which synchronizes individual consciousnesses to a universal flow of time, enabling the perception of progression within the simulation and ensuring a cohesive shared reality
– Each player perceives time uniquely, with their emotional and intellectual state subtly stretching or compressing their experience of temporal progression depending on their unique nodal coordinate or vector point within the Materium
– The soul interprets all unique perceptions while ensuring they remain compatible with the simulation’s overall temporal framework, preserving both individuality and collective coherence, ensuring the illusion of a unified reality
– Extreme negative or powerful sensory human emotions (e.g., sex, rage, murder, death, etc.) function as high-energy inputs into the simulation, influencing its evolution, feeding higher-dimensional entities who harvest energy from these surges
– The simulation’s rules (e.g., physical constants, technologies, societal dynamics, or environmental constraints, etc.) adapt and adjust in complexity as players achieve higher levels of skill, understanding, or comprehension
– Interactions with dimensions or mechanisms beyond the physical laws of observable space are inaccessible to all players, just like areas beyond the boundaries of a video game map
– At larger scales, the simulation “renders” reality only where conscious observation occurs, with unobserved areas persisting solely as probabilistic data structures awaiting collapse into defined states upon observation
– Death in the simulation serves as a reset mechanism, allowing consciousness to respawn back into the game with new parameters to maximize opportunities for learning, novelty, and evolution
– The physical constants of the game universe are the result of deliberate calibration within a higher-dimensional framework
– The game universe is encoded on a cosmic boundary, similar to a storage device running a program
– Consciousness is the foundation of reality within the game engine
– Reality isn’t just observed by consciousness, it’s created by it
– The game universe is an infinite feedback loop where consciousness creates reality, observation unfolds it, and reality evolves consciousness, ensuring the cycle goes on forever
_______
If you like The Unconquered Mind, sign up for our email list and we’ll send you new posts when they come out.
If you liked this post, these are for you too:
The Discontinuity Dilemma: Energy, Mars, and Infinity